Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US annual

Equatorial Guinea
1.34 % change on previous year
in 2024
Serbia
1.08 % change on previous year
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
50th
Serbia rank
53rd

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US annual over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Serbia
-20-1001020196219932024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.34 % change on previous year against 1.08 % change on previous year in Serbia, a difference of 0.26 % change on previous year.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 53rd of 134 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.8704 % change on previous year -0.0694 % change on previous year 0.9398 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea
2010s 1.07 % change on previous year 1.89 % change on previous year 0.8216 % change on previous year Serbia
2020s 2.75 % change on previous year -0.1983 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1.34 % change on previous year against 1.08 % change on previous year in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
0.26 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 50th and Serbia ranks 53rd of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/equatorial-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/equatorial-guinea/serbia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,168 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.