How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Rwanda: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Latvia

1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Rwanda

0.8288 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

53rd

Rwanda rank

54th

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

Latvia
Rwanda

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8288 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.1912 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 53rd and Rwanda ranks 54th of 114 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2635 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.9028 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.5221 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3807 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	0.9796 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0714 1000 USD per square kilometre	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Latvia or Rwanda?: Latvia, at 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8288 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Latvia and Rwanda?: 0.1912 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Latvia ranks 53rd and Rwanda ranks 54th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Rwanda: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/latvia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/latvia/rwanda/">Latvia vs Rwanda: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.