How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Norway: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Latvia

1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Norway

1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

53rd

Norway rank

50th

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

Latvia
Norway

How they compare

Norway currently reports 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.26 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 53rd and Norway ranks 50th of 114 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Norway	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9656 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4542 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.9028 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2052 1000 USD per square kilometre	Norway
2010s	0.9796 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3305 1000 USD per square kilometre	Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Latvia or Norway?: Norway, at 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Latvia and Norway?: 0.26 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Latvia and Norway rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Latvia ranks 53rd and Norway ranks 50th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Norway: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/latvia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/latvia/norway/">Latvia vs Norway: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.