Finland vs Rwanda: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Finland
1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Rwanda
0.8288 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
52nd
Rwanda rank
54th

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

  • Finland
  • Rwanda
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8288 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.2212 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 52nd and Rwanda ranks 54th of 114 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4282 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0804 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3478 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.7693 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1152 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6541 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1980s 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2533 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7662 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1990s 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2642 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7522 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2000s 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5221 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6135 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2010s 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0618 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Finland or Rwanda?
Finland, at 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8288 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Finland and Rwanda?
0.2212 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Rwanda?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Finland and Rwanda rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Finland ranks 52nd and Rwanda ranks 54th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Rwanda: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/finland/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/finland/rwanda/">Finland vs Rwanda: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.