Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Equatorial Guinea
0.0293 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.0594 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
97th
Kazakhstan rank
94th

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kazakhstan
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0594 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0293 1000 USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0301 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 2.0 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 97th and Kazakhstan ranks 94th of 114 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0211 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1132 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0921 1000 USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.023 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1143 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0913 1000 USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 0.0257 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1016 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0759 1000 USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2020s 0.0286 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0634 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0348 1000 USD per square kilometre Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Equatorial Guinea or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 0.0594 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0293 1000 USD per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
0.0301 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 97th and Kazakhstan ranks 94th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/equatorial-guinea/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/equatorial-guinea/kazakhstan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.