Cyprus vs Poland: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Cyprus
10.18 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Poland
7.65 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Cyprus rank
15th
Poland rank
17th

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

  • Cyprus
  • Poland
051015196119892017

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 10.18 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.65 1000 USD per square kilometre in Poland, a difference of 2.53 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.3 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Cyprus ranks 15th and Poland ranks 17th of 114 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.6 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1970s 3.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.87 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.56 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1980s 5.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.25 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1990s 9.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9234 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
2000s 12.83 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 11.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.19 1000 USD per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Cyprus or Poland?
Cyprus, at 10.18 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.65 1000 USD per square kilometre in Poland as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Cyprus and Poland?
2.53 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Poland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Cyprus and Poland rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Cyprus ranks 15th and Poland ranks 17th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Poland: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/cyprus/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/cyprus/poland/">Cyprus vs Poland: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.