Congo vs Namibia: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Congo
0.0173 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0104 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
100th
Namibia rank
101st

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

  • Congo
  • Namibia
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0173 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0104 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.7 times Namibia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 100th and Namibia ranks 101st of 114 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0154 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0136 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0246 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0223 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0215 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0291 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0274 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0213 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0049 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0164 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.024 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.014 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0184 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0121 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0063 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Congo or Namibia?
Congo, at 0.0173 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0104 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Congo and Namibia?
0.0069 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Congo ranks 100th and Namibia ranks 101st of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.