Chile vs Ecuador: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Chile
1.87 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
1.88 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
43rd
Ecuador rank
42nd

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

  • Chile
  • Ecuador
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 1.88 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.87 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Chile ranks 43rd and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 114 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.104 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2252 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1212 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.1282 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3134 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1852 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.2323 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4908 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2585 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.5586 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7294 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1708 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9517 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3521 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4934 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 1.86 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.53 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3313 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chile or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 1.88 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.87 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chile and Ecuador?
0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Ecuador rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chile ranks 43rd and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Ecuador: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/ecuador/">Chile vs Ecuador: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.