How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Latvia?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brazil vs Latvia: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Brazil

0.7733 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Brazil rank

56th

Latvia rank

53rd

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

Brazil
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.7733 1000 USD per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.2467 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 53rd of 114 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brazil	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.2739 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.4229 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9028 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4799 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	0.4899 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9796 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4896 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Brazil or Latvia?: Latvia, at 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.7733 1000 USD per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Brazil and Latvia?: 0.2467 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Latvia?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Brazil and Latvia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Brazil ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 53rd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Latvia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/brazil/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/brazil/latvia/">Brazil vs Latvia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.