How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?

24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Croatia: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Belarus

3.87 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Croatia

3.07 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Belarus rank

28th

Croatia rank

31st

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

Belarus
Croatia

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 3.87 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.07 1000 USD per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 0.8 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Croatia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 28th and Croatia ranks 31st of 114 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Croatia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.95 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.92 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	3.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	1 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	4.17 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.74 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Belarus or Croatia?: Belarus, at 3.87 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.07 1000 USD per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Belarus and Croatia?: 0.8 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Croatia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2017.
How do Belarus and Croatia rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Belarus ranks 28th and Croatia ranks 31st of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Croatia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/belarus/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/belarus/croatia/">Belarus vs Croatia: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.