Azerbaijan vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square

Azerbaijan
0.0188 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0293 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Azerbaijan rank
99th
Equatorial Guinea rank
97th

Meat of pig: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US square over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Equatorial Guinea
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0293 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0188 1000 USD per square kilometre in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.0105 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.6 times Azerbaijan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 99th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 97th of 114 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0862 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0211 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0651 1000 USD per square kilometre Azerbaijan
2000s 0.0619 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.023 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0389 1000 USD per square kilometre Azerbaijan
2010s 0.0241 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0257 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0188 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0286 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0098 1000 USD per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Azerbaijan or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0293 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0188 1000 USD per square kilometre in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Azerbaijan and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0105 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Equatorial Guinea?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Azerbaijan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Azerbaijan ranks 99th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 97th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/azerbaijan/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-pig-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/azerbaijan/equatorial-guinea/">Azerbaijan vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
115 places, 6,300 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of pig with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.