Brazil vs Italy: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Brazil
0.0267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy
0.0318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Brazil rank
109th
Italy rank
106th

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Brazil
  • Italy
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 0.0318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 109th and Italy ranks 106th of 146 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Italy Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0686 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0552 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
1970s 0.0141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0666 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0525 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
1980s 0.0166 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0715 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0548 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
1990s 0.0221 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0724 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0504 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
2000s 0.0193 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0561 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0368 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy
2010s 0.0198 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0306 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Brazil or Italy?
Italy, at 0.0318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Brazil and Italy?
0.0051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Italy?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Brazil and Italy rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Brazil ranks 109th and Italy ranks 106th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Italy: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/brazil/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-6/brazil/italy/">Brazil vs Italy: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,330 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.