Mauritius vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value

Mauritius
0 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Mauritius rank
145th
Papua New Guinea rank
143rd

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value over time

  • Mauritius
  • Papua New Guinea
00.0010.0010.002196119922024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 145th and Papua New Guinea ranks 143rd of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0015 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0.0014 1000 Int$ per person Mauritius
1970s 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0.001 1000 Int$ per person Mauritius
1980s 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0.0007 1000 Int$ per person Mauritius
1990s 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person Mauritius
2000s 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person Mauritius
2010s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person Mauritius
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person 0 1000 Int$ per person Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value, Mauritius or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 1000 Int$ per person against 0 1000 Int$ per person in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value between Mauritius and Papua New Guinea?
0 1000 Int$ per person, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Papua New Guinea rank globally for meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production value?
Mauritius ranks 145th and Papua New Guinea ranks 143rd of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-4/mauritius/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-goat-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-4/mauritius/papua-new-guinea/">Mauritius vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,455 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of goat, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.