Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
0.0094 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0143 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
161st
Namibia rank
158th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Namibia
00.0050.010.015196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0143 t per square kilometre against 0.0094 t per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0049 t per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 161st and Namibia ranks 158th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0025 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0019 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0039 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0025 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.005 t per square kilometre 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0029 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0066 t per square kilometre 0.0045 t per square kilometre 0.0022 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0081 t per square kilometre 0.0118 t per square kilometre 0.0037 t per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0087 t per square kilometre 0.0137 t per square kilometre 0.005 t per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0092 t per square kilometre 0.0143 t per square kilometre 0.0051 t per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — production, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0143 t per square kilometre against 0.0094 t per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — production, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
0.0049 t per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — production, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 161st and Namibia ranks 158th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/namibia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,683 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.