Mozambique vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Mozambique
0.1086 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.1019 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
128th
Rwanda rank
129th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Mozambique
  • Rwanda
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.1086 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.1019 1000 An per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0067 1000 An per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Mozambique ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 129th of 168 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0094 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0181 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0087 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.0217 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0302 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0085 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.0316 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0544 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0228 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.0417 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0692 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0276 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.038 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0913 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0533 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.0598 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2266 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1668 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.0986 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1465 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0478 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered, Mozambique or Rwanda?
Mozambique, at 0.1086 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.1019 1000 An per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered between Mozambique and Rwanda?
0.0067 1000 An per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Rwanda rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered?
Mozambique ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 129th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/rwanda/">Mozambique vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.