Eswatini vs Guyana: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Eswatini
0.1656 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Guyana
0.1623 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
117th
Guyana rank
119th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guyana
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.1656 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.1623 1000 An per square kilometre in Guyana, a difference of 0.0033 1000 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 117th and Guyana ranks 119th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Guyana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guyana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0192 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0138 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0054 1000 An per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0301 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0417 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0115 1000 An per square kilometre Guyana
1980s 0.0489 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0236 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0254 1000 An per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0716 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0326 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0391 1000 An per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.1213 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0958 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0255 1000 An per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0.1524 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1374 1000 An per square kilometre 0.015 1000 An per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.1568 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1564 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 An per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered, Eswatini or Guyana?
Eswatini, at 0.1656 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.1623 1000 An per square kilometre in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered between Eswatini and Guyana?
0.0033 1000 An per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guyana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Guyana rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered?
Eswatini ranks 117th and Guyana ranks 119th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guyana: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guyana/">Eswatini vs Guyana: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.