Cuba vs New Caledonia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Cuba
0.0296 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.0313 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
150th
New Caledonia rank
148th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Cuba
  • New Caledonia
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0313 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.0296 1000 An per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.0017 1000 An per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 150th and New Caledonia ranks 148th of 168 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2762 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0106 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2656 1000 An per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.4342 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0189 1000 An per square kilometre 0.4153 1000 An per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.6487 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0311 1000 An per square kilometre 0.6176 1000 An per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.4759 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0402 1000 An per square kilometre 0.4357 1000 An per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.2847 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0399 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2447 1000 An per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.2362 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0264 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2098 1000 An per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.1279 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0313 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0966 1000 An per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered, Cuba or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.0313 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.0296 1000 An per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered between Cuba and New Caledonia?
0.0017 1000 An per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and New Caledonia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered?
Cuba ranks 150th and New Caledonia ranks 148th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs New Caledonia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/cuba/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/cuba/new-caledonia/">Cuba vs New Caledonia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.