Congo vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Congo
0.02 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0161 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
155th
Namibia rank
158th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Congo
  • Namibia
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.02 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.0161 1000 An per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0039 1000 An per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 158th of 168 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0029 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 An per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0053 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 An per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0139 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0026 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0113 1000 An per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0164 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0056 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0108 1000 An per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0164 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0147 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 An per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0192 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0165 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 An per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0199 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0162 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 An per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered, Congo or Namibia?
Congo, at 0.02 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.0161 1000 An per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered between Congo and Namibia?
0.0039 1000 An per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered?
Congo ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 158th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.