Canada vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Canada
0.0914 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.1019 1000 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
132nd
Rwanda rank
129th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Canada
  • Rwanda
00.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.1019 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.0914 1000 An per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0105 1000 An per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Canada ranks 132nd and Rwanda ranks 129th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0185 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0181 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 An per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.028 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0302 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.0382 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0544 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0162 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.0531 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0692 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0161 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.0696 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0913 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0217 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.0769 1000 An per square kilometre 0.2266 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1496 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.0883 1000 An per square kilometre 0.1465 1000 An per square kilometre 0.0582 1000 An per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered, Canada or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.1019 1000 An per square kilometre against 0.0914 1000 An per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered between Canada and Rwanda?
0.0105 1000 An per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Rwanda rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — producing animals/slaughtered?
Canada ranks 132nd and Rwanda ranks 129th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/canada/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square-kilometre/canada/rwanda/">Canada vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
1000 An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,676 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.