Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Namibia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production over time
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 27.57 % change on previous year against 4.42 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 23.15 % change on previous year.
That makes Namibia's figure about 6.2 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 26 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Namibia ahead.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 14th of 30 groups.
Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.85 % change on previous year | 21.46 % change on previous year | 16.62 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1970s | 4.58 % change on previous year | 5.85 % change on previous year | 1.28 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 1980s | 4.24 % change on previous year | 3.67 % change on previous year | 0.5691 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 3.21 % change on previous year | 6.45 % change on previous year | 3.24 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2000s | 4.97 % change on previous year | 8.94 % change on previous year | 3.97 % change on previous year | Namibia |
| 2010s | 4.8 % change on previous year | 4.05 % change on previous year | 0.7472 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 4.42 % change on previous year | 4.95 % change on previous year | 0.5261 % change on previous year | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 27.57 % change on previous year against 4.42 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia?
- 23.15 % change on previous year, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Namibia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 14th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.