Chile vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production

Chile
1.46 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
71st
Rwanda rank
74th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production over time

  • Chile
  • Rwanda
01234196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.46 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.15 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Chile ranks 71st and Rwanda ranks 74th of 122 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0675 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0881 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0206 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.1106 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1465 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.036 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.2083 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2535 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0452 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.5449 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3328 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2121 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.9447 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4375 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5071 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.03 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production, Chile or Rwanda?
Chile, at 1.46 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production between Chile and Rwanda?
0.15 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production?
Chile ranks 71st and Rwanda ranks 74th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-10/chile/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-10/chile/rwanda/">Chile vs Rwanda: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,739 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.