How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Latvia?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Argentina vs Latvia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production

Argentina

1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia

1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Argentina rank

77th

Latvia rank

76th

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production over time

Argentina
Latvia

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Argentina ranks 77th and Latvia ranks 76th of 122 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Argentina	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.3452 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3428 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0024 1000 USD per square kilometre	Argentina
2000s	0.5028 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4791 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0238 1000 USD per square kilometre	Argentina
2010s	0.9198 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.88 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0398 1000 USD per square kilometre	Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production, Argentina or Latvia?: Latvia, at 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production between Argentina and Latvia?: 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Latvia?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Argentina and Latvia rank globally for meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross production?: Argentina ranks 77th and Latvia ranks 76th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Latvia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-10/argentina/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-chickens-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-10/argentina/latvia/">Argentina vs Latvia: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,739 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 04 October 2026

Meat of chickens, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.