How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?

59 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Gambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass

Eswatini

0 kg/An per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Gambia

0 kg/An per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Eswatini rank

23rd

Gambia rank

20th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass over time

Eswatini
Gambia

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0 kg/An per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/An per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kg/An per US$ of GDP.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Gambia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 23rd and Gambia ranks 20th of 166 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Gambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	Gambia
1970s	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	Gambia
1980s	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	Gambia
1990s	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	Gambia
2000s	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	Gambia
2010s	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	Gambia
2020s	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	0 kg/An per US$ of GDP	Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — yield/carcass, Eswatini or Gambia?: Gambia, at 0 kg/An per US$ of GDP against 0 kg/An per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — yield/carcass between Eswatini and Gambia?: 0 kg/An per US$ of GDP, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — yield/carcass?: Eswatini ranks 23rd and Gambia ranks 20th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Gambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-yield-carcass-weight-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-yield-carcass-weight-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/gambia-the/">Eswatini vs Gambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight, per unit of GDP
Unit: kg/An per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 167 places, 9,069 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 19 September 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Yield/Carcass Weight divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.