Malta vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per

Malta
3.44 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
3.42 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
7th
Uruguay rank
8th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per over time

  • Malta
  • Uruguay
246810196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 3.44 t per square kilometre against 3.42 t per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0.02 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 167 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 8.02 t per square kilometre 1.71 t per square kilometre 6.3 t per square kilometre Malta
1970s 6.44 t per square kilometre 1.86 t per square kilometre 4.58 t per square kilometre Malta
1980s 5.36 t per square kilometre 1.99 t per square kilometre 3.37 t per square kilometre Malta
1990s 5.19 t per square kilometre 2.15 t per square kilometre 3.05 t per square kilometre Malta
2000s 4.59 t per square kilometre 2.76 t per square kilometre 1.82 t per square kilometre Malta
2010s 3.54 t per square kilometre 3.08 t per square kilometre 0.4562 t per square kilometre Malta
2020s 3.38 t per square kilometre 3.28 t per square kilometre 0.1001 t per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per, Malta or Uruguay?
Malta, at 3.44 t per square kilometre against 3.42 t per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per between Malta and Uruguay?
0.02 t per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per?
Malta ranks 7th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/malta/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/malta/uruguay/">Malta vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.