Iceland vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per

Iceland
0.0484 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0501 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
149th
Namibia rank
146th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per over time

  • Iceland
  • Namibia
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0501 t per square kilometre against 0.0484 t per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0017 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 146th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.024 t per square kilometre 0.0268 t per square kilometre 0.0028 t per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0254 t per square kilometre 0.0384 t per square kilometre 0.0131 t per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0283 t per square kilometre 0.0437 t per square kilometre 0.0154 t per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0329 t per square kilometre 0.0532 t per square kilometre 0.0203 t per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0358 t per square kilometre 0.0548 t per square kilometre 0.0191 t per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0415 t per square kilometre 0.0421 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0482 t per square kilometre 0.0359 t per square kilometre 0.0123 t per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per, Iceland or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0501 t per square kilometre against 0.0484 t per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per between Iceland and Namibia?
0.0017 t per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per?
Iceland ranks 149th and Namibia ranks 146th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.