Georgia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per

Georgia
0.3267 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.3124 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
90th
Zambia rank
91st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per over time

  • Georgia
  • Zambia
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.3267 t per square kilometre against 0.3124 t per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.0143 t per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 91st of 167 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6672 t per square kilometre 0.0676 t per square kilometre 0.5996 t per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 0.5847 t per square kilometre 0.0884 t per square kilometre 0.4963 t per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 0.3159 t per square kilometre 0.2384 t per square kilometre 0.0775 t per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 0.3134 t per square kilometre 0.2617 t per square kilometre 0.0517 t per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per, Georgia or Zambia?
Georgia, at 0.3267 t per square kilometre against 0.3124 t per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per between Georgia and Zambia?
0.0143 t per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zambia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Zambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per?
Georgia ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 91st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/georgia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/georgia/zambia/">Georgia vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.