Eswatini vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per

Eswatini
0.9749 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
1.03 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
44th
Mauritius rank
41st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per over time

  • Eswatini
  • Mauritius
0.50.7511.21.51.8196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 1.03 t per square kilometre against 0.9749 t per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0551 t per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Eswatini ranks 44th and Mauritius ranks 41st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6443 t per square kilometre 1.04 t per square kilometre 0.3953 t per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.7791 t per square kilometre 0.7104 t per square kilometre 0.0687 t per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.8314 t per square kilometre 0.6877 t per square kilometre 0.1437 t per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.7867 t per square kilometre 1.29 t per square kilometre 0.5064 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.8193 t per square kilometre 1.34 t per square kilometre 0.5215 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.8847 t per square kilometre 1.08 t per square kilometre 0.1953 t per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.8948 t per square kilometre 0.9726 t per square kilometre 0.0778 t per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per, Eswatini or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 1.03 t per square kilometre against 0.9749 t per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per between Eswatini and Mauritius?
0.0551 t per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Mauritius rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per?
Eswatini ranks 44th and Mauritius ranks 41st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/mauritius/">Eswatini vs Mauritius: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.