Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per

Belarus
1.85 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.92 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
22nd
Zimbabwe rank
20th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.92 t per square kilometre against 1.85 t per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.07 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1.65 t per square kilometre 1.37 t per square kilometre 0.2778 t per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 1.22 t per square kilometre 1.46 t per square kilometre 0.2336 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 1.55 t per square kilometre 1.65 t per square kilometre 0.1007 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 1.73 t per square kilometre 1.81 t per square kilometre 0.0725 t per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.92 t per square kilometre against 1.85 t per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
0.07 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per?
Belarus ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.