Honduras vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual

Honduras
-1.52 % change on previous year
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
-1.74 % change on previous year
in 2024
Honduras rank
137th
Papua New Guinea rank
140th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual over time

  • Honduras
  • Papua New Guinea
-200204060196219932024

How they compare

Honduras currently reports -1.52 % change on previous year against -1.74 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.22 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Honduras ranks 137th and Papua New Guinea ranks 140th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 5 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 6.67 % change on previous year 15.64 % change on previous year 8.96 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
1970s 8.11 % change on previous year 4.54 % change on previous year 3.57 % change on previous year Honduras
1980s 0.0062 % change on previous year -0.4258 % change on previous year 0.432 % change on previous year Honduras
1990s 3.34 % change on previous year 1.99 % change on previous year 1.35 % change on previous year Honduras
2000s 0.6933 % change on previous year 2.38 % change on previous year 1.69 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
2010s 1.72 % change on previous year -2.42 % change on previous year 4.14 % change on previous year Honduras
2020s -0.2331 % change on previous year -1.44 % change on previous year 1.21 % change on previous year Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, annual, Honduras or Papua New Guinea?
Honduras, at -1.52 % change on previous year against -1.74 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, annual between Honduras and Papua New Guinea?
0.22 % change on previous year, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Honduras and Papua New Guinea rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, annual?
Honduras ranks 137th and Papua New Guinea ranks 140th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-annual-growth-rate/honduras/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-annual-growth-rate/honduras/papua-new-guinea/">Honduras vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,580 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.