Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production (cattle)

Argentina
3.18 million t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand
3.33 million t
in 2024
Argentina rank
7th
Australia and New Zealand rank
6th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production (cattle) over time

  • Argentina
  • Australia and New Zealand
1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M3.0M3.5M196119922024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 3.33 million t against 3.18 million t in Argentina, a difference of 153,570 t.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 7th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Australia and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Australia and New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 2.38 million t 1.19 million t 1.19 million t Argentina
1970s 2.55 million t 2.04 million t 513,971 t Argentina
1980s 2.68 million t 1.99 million t 696,605 t Argentina
1990s 2.76 million t 2.40 million t 363,255 t Argentina
2000s 2.93 million t 2.73 million t 199,428 t Argentina
2010s 2.76 million t 2.96 million t 200,432 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 3.15 million t 2.88 million t 269,158 t Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, Argentina or Australia and New Zealand?
Australia and New Zealand, at 3.33 million t against 3.18 million t in Argentina as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production between Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
153,570 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Australia and New Zealand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Australia and New Zealand rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production?
Argentina ranks 7th and Australia and New Zealand ranks 6th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-2/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-production-2/argentina/australia-and-new-zealand/">Argentina vs Australia and New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.