Liberia vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing

Liberia
0.0884 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0.0474 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia rank
160th
Papua New Guinea rank
163rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing over time

  • Liberia
  • Papua New Guinea
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 0.0884 An per square kilometre against 0.0474 An per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.041 An per square kilometre.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.9 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Liberia has been ahead every year.

Liberia ranks 160th and Papua New Guinea ranks 163rd of 167 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.184 An per square kilometre 0.0136 An per square kilometre 0.1704 An per square kilometre Liberia
1970s 0.208 An per square kilometre 0.0311 An per square kilometre 0.1769 An per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 0.143 An per square kilometre 0.0315 An per square kilometre 0.1115 An per square kilometre Liberia
1990s 0.0831 An per square kilometre 0.0347 An per square kilometre 0.0483 An per square kilometre Liberia
2000s 0.0847 An per square kilometre 0.0454 An per square kilometre 0.0393 An per square kilometre Liberia
2010s 0.095 An per square kilometre 0.0474 An per square kilometre 0.0477 An per square kilometre Liberia
2020s 0.0908 An per square kilometre 0.0471 An per square kilometre 0.0437 An per square kilometre Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing, Liberia or Papua New Guinea?
Liberia, at 0.0884 An per square kilometre against 0.0474 An per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing between Liberia and Papua New Guinea?
0.041 An per square kilometre, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Liberia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing?
Liberia ranks 160th and Papua New Guinea ranks 163rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/liberia/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/liberia/papua-new-guinea/">Liberia vs Papua New Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.