Iceland vs Mauritania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing

Iceland
0.2273 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.2373 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
150th
Mauritania rank
149th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritania
0.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.2373 An per square kilometre against 0.2273 An per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.01 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 150th and Mauritania ranks 149th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3629 An per square kilometre 0.0995 An per square kilometre 0.2634 An per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.3425 An per square kilometre 0.1027 An per square kilometre 0.2398 An per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.2578 An per square kilometre 0.1224 An per square kilometre 0.1353 An per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.2376 An per square kilometre 0.102 An per square kilometre 0.1356 An per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.2116 An per square kilometre 0.1945 An per square kilometre 0.0171 An per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.2129 An per square kilometre 0.223 An per square kilometre 0.0101 An per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.225 An per square kilometre 0.2343 An per square kilometre 0.0093 An per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing, Iceland or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0.2373 An per square kilometre against 0.2273 An per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing between Iceland and Mauritania?
0.01 An per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing?
Iceland ranks 150th and Mauritania ranks 149th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/iceland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/iceland/mauritania/">Iceland vs Mauritania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.