French Polynesia vs Iceland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing

French Polynesia
0.2576 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.2273 An per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
147th
Iceland rank
150th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Iceland
0.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.2576 An per square kilometre against 0.2273 An per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0303 An per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 147th and Iceland ranks 150th of 167 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4614 An per square kilometre 0.3629 An per square kilometre 0.0985 An per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 0.403 An per square kilometre 0.3425 An per square kilometre 0.0605 An per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 0.4005 An per square kilometre 0.2578 An per square kilometre 0.1428 An per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 0.2754 An per square kilometre 0.2376 An per square kilometre 0.0378 An per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 0.2783 An per square kilometre 0.2116 An per square kilometre 0.0667 An per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.2521 An per square kilometre 0.2129 An per square kilometre 0.0392 An per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 0.2759 An per square kilometre 0.225 An per square kilometre 0.0509 An per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing, French Polynesia or Iceland?
French Polynesia, at 0.2576 An per square kilometre against 0.2273 An per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing between French Polynesia and Iceland?
0.0303 An per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Iceland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing?
French Polynesia ranks 147th and Iceland ranks 150th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Iceland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/french-polynesia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/french-polynesia/iceland/">French Polynesia vs Iceland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.