Cuba vs Jamaica: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing

Cuba
2.89 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
2.76 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
69th
Jamaica rank
72nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing over time

  • Cuba
  • Jamaica
2.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 2.89 An per square kilometre against 2.76 An per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.13 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 69th and Jamaica ranks 72nd of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Jamaica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 9.54 An per square kilometre 5.58 An per square kilometre 3.97 An per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 8.85 An per square kilometre 5.71 An per square kilometre 3.14 An per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 8.41 An per square kilometre 6.01 An per square kilometre 2.41 An per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 5.32 An per square kilometre 6.56 An per square kilometre 1.25 An per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 3.89 An per square kilometre 4.13 An per square kilometre 0.2406 An per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 4.22 An per square kilometre 2.21 An per square kilometre 2.01 An per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 3.51 An per square kilometre 2.67 An per square kilometre 0.8363 An per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing, Cuba or Jamaica?
Cuba, at 2.89 An per square kilometre against 2.76 An per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing between Cuba and Jamaica?
0.13 An per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Jamaica rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — producing?
Cuba ranks 69th and Jamaica ranks 72nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Jamaica: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cuba/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/cuba/jamaica/">Cuba vs Jamaica: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.