How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Hungary?

27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (current thousand SLC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs Hungary: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Congo

14.65 million 1000 SLC

in 2024

Hungary

20.25 million 1000 SLC

in 2017

Congo rank

51st

Hungary rank

48th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Congo
Hungary

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 20.25 million 1000 SLC against 14.65 million 1000 SLC in Congo, a difference of 5.60 million 1000 SLC.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.4 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Hungary ahead.

Congo ranks 51st and Hungary ranks 48th of 134 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	Hungary	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.85 million 1000 SLC	16.11 million 1000 SLC	14.25 million 1000 SLC	Hungary
2000s	9.27 million 1000 SLC	18.10 million 1000 SLC	8.83 million 1000 SLC	Hungary
2010s	16.83 million 1000 SLC	20.39 million 1000 SLC	3.56 million 1000 SLC	Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Congo or Hungary?: Hungary, at 20.25 million 1000 SLC against 14.65 million 1000 SLC in Congo as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Congo and Hungary?: 5.60 million 1000 SLC, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Hungary?: 27 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
How do Congo and Hungary rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Congo ranks 51st and Hungary ranks 48th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (current thousand SLC). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Hungary: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-current/congo-rep/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-current/congo-rep/hungary/">Congo vs Hungary: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (current thousand SLC)
Unit: 1000 SLC
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 146 places, 4,441 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed: 13 August 2026

The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.