Australia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Meat of cattle: Gross Production Value (constant) … I constant
Meat of cattle: Gross Production Value (constant) … I constant over time
- Australia
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 27.50 million 1000 Int$ against 11.15 million 1000 Int$ in Australia, a difference of 16.35 million 1000 Int$.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.5 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
Australia ranks 8th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 250 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.86 million 1000 Int$ | 5.46 million 1000 Int$ | 1.60 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 6.70 million 1000 Int$ | 6.78 million 1000 Int$ | 86,809 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 6.37 million 1000 Int$ | 8.29 million 1000 Int$ | 1.92 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 7.83 million 1000 Int$ | 12.06 million 1000 Int$ | 4.23 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 9.02 million 1000 Int$ | 16.29 million 1000 Int$ | 7.27 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 9.96 million 1000 Int$ | 21.90 million 1000 Int$ | 11.93 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 9.24 million 1000 Int$ | 26.10 million 1000 Int$ | 16.86 million 1000 Int$ | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Australia or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 27.50 million 1000 Int$ against 11.15 million 1000 Int$ in Australia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 16.35 million 1000 Int$, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Australia ranks 8th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 250 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.