How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Palestine?

29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nigeria vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Nigeria

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Palestine

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2022

Nigeria rank

49th

Palestine rank

52nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Nigeria
Palestine

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Palestine, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Nigeria ahead.

Nigeria ranks 49th and Palestine ranks 52nd of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nigeria averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nigeria	Palestine	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Nigeria
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Nigeria
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Palestine
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Nigeria or Palestine?: Nigeria, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Palestine as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Nigeria and Palestine?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Palestine?: 29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Nigeria and Palestine rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Nigeria ranks 49th and Palestine ranks 52nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/nigeria/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/nigeria/west-bank-and-gaza/">Nigeria vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.