How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Serbia?

19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nigeria vs Serbia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Nigeria

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Serbia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Nigeria rank

49th

Serbia rank

48th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Nigeria
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Nigeria, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Nigeria ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 48th of 122 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nigeria	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Serbia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Serbia
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Nigeria or Serbia?: Serbia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Nigeria as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Nigeria and Serbia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Serbia?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Nigeria and Serbia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Nigeria ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 48th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nigeria vs Serbia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/nigeria/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/nigeria/serbia/">Nigeria vs Serbia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.