How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zambia?

30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Nepal vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Nepal

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 1990

Zambia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Nepal rank

6th

Zambia rank

4th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Nepal
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Nepal, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Nepal ranks 6th and Zambia ranks 4th of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Nepal	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1970s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Nepal or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Nepal and Zambia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zambia?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Nepal and Zambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Nepal ranks 6th and Zambia ranks 4th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/nepal/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/nepal/zambia/">Nepal vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.