How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?

23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Norway: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Latvia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Norway

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Latvia rank

83rd

Norway rank

85th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Latvia
Norway

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 83rd and Norway ranks 85th of 122 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Norway	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Latvia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Latvia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Latvia or Norway?: Latvia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Latvia and Norway?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?: 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
How do Latvia and Norway rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Latvia ranks 83rd and Norway ranks 85th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Norway: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/latvia/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/latvia/norway/">Latvia vs Norway: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.