How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mozambique?

34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Jordan vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Jordan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Mozambique

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Jordan rank

42nd

Mozambique rank

43rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Jordan
Mozambique

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Mozambique, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mozambique ahead.

Jordan ranks 42nd and Mozambique ranks 43rd of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Jordan	Mozambique	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Mozambique
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Mozambique
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Mozambique
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Jordan or Mozambique?: Jordan, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Jordan and Mozambique?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mozambique?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Jordan and Mozambique rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Jordan ranks 42nd and Mozambique ranks 43rd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/jordan/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/jordan/mozambique/">Jordan vs Mozambique: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.