How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Malta?

48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Jamaica vs Malta: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Jamaica

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malta

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Jamaica rank

113th

Malta rank

112th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Jamaica
Malta

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Jamaica, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.

Jamaica ranks 113th and Malta ranks 112th of 122 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Jamaica	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Jamaica
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Jamaica or Malta?: Malta, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Jamaica as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Jamaica and Malta?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Malta?: 48 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2017.
How do Jamaica and Malta rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Jamaica ranks 113th and Malta ranks 112th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Malta: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/jamaica/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/jamaica/malta/">Jamaica vs Malta: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.