How many years of comparable data are there for India and Indonesia?

24 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 1990.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

India vs Indonesia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

India

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 1990

Indonesia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

India rank

68th

Indonesia rank

69th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

India
Indonesia

How they compare

India currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Indonesia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

India ranks 68th and Indonesia ranks 69th of 122 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	India	Indonesia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Indonesia
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Indonesia
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Indonesia
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, India or Indonesia?: India, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Indonesia as of 1990.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between India and Indonesia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Indonesia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 1990.
How do India and Indonesia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: India ranks 68th and Indonesia ranks 69th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Indonesia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/india/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/india/indonesia/">India vs Indonesia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.