How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Jordan?

31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Georgia vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Georgia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Jordan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Georgia rank

45th

Jordan rank

42nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Georgia
Jordan

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Georgia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 45th and Jordan ranks 42nd of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Georgia	Jordan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Georgia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Georgia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Georgia
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Georgia or Jordan?: Jordan, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Georgia as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Georgia and Jordan?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Jordan?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Jordan rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Georgia ranks 45th and Jordan ranks 42nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/georgia/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/georgia/jordan/">Georgia vs Jordan: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.