How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and India?

30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs India: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Ecuador

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

India

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 1990

Ecuador rank

70th

India rank

68th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Ecuador
India

How they compare

India currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Ecuador, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 70th and India ranks 68th of 122 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	India	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ecuador
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Ecuador or India?: India, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Ecuador as of 1990.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Ecuador and India?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and India?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
How do Ecuador and India rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Ecuador ranks 70th and India ranks 68th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs India: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/ecuador/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/ecuador/india/">Ecuador vs India: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.