How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Iceland?

43 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cyprus vs Iceland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Cyprus

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Iceland

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Cyprus rank

98th

Iceland rank

100th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Cyprus
Iceland

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Iceland, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Iceland ahead.

Cyprus ranks 98th and Iceland ranks 100th of 122 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cyprus	Iceland	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Cyprus
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Cyprus or Iceland?: Cyprus, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Iceland as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Cyprus and Iceland?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Iceland?: 43 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2017.
How do Cyprus and Iceland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Cyprus ranks 98th and Iceland ranks 100th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Iceland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/cyprus/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/cyprus/iceland/">Cyprus vs Iceland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.