How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ethiopia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brazil vs Ethiopia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Brazil

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Ethiopia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Brazil rank

18th

Ethiopia rank

16th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Brazil
Ethiopia

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Brazil, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Brazil's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 18th and Ethiopia ranks 16th of 122 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brazil	Ethiopia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ethiopia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ethiopia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ethiopia
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Brazil or Ethiopia?: Ethiopia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Brazil as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Brazil and Ethiopia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Ethiopia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Ethiopia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Brazil ranks 18th and Ethiopia ranks 16th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Ethiopia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/brazil/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/brazil/ethiopia/">Brazil vs Ethiopia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.