How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nigeria?

18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Nigeria: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Belgium

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Nigeria

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Belgium rank

51st

Nigeria rank

49th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Belgium
Nigeria

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nigeria ahead.

Belgium ranks 51st and Nigeria ranks 49th of 122 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Nigeria	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Nigeria
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Belgium or Nigeria?: Nigeria, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Belgium and Nigeria?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Nigeria?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Belgium and Nigeria rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Belgium ranks 51st and Nigeria ranks 49th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Nigeria: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/belgium/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/belgium/nigeria/">Belgium vs Nigeria: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.