Belarus vs Ethiopia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Belarus
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ethiopia
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Belarus rank
17th
Ethiopia rank
16th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Belarus
  • Ethiopia
00000199320082024

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Belarus, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 17th and Ethiopia ranks 16th of 122 countries.

Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2000s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2010s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Ethiopia
2020s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP Ethiopia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Belarus or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Belarus and Ethiopia?
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ethiopia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Ethiopia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Belarus ranks 17th and Ethiopia ranks 16th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Ethiopia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/belarus/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/belarus/ethiopia/">Belarus vs Ethiopia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.