How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Cambodia?

43 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Cambodia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Austria

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2017

Cambodia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Austria rank

62nd

Cambodia rank

65th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Austria
Cambodia

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Cambodia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

Across all 43 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 62nd and Cambodia ranks 65th of 122 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Cambodia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Austria or Cambodia?: Austria, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Cambodia as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Austria and Cambodia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Cambodia?: 43 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2017.
How do Austria and Cambodia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Austria ranks 62nd and Cambodia ranks 65th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Cambodia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/austria/cambodia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-9/austria/cambodia/">Austria vs Cambodia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,344 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.